Fitness: The Ardell Real Wellness Self-Assessment - the rationale Dimension INTRODUCTION

Fitness: The Ardell Real Wellness Self-Assessment - the rationale Dimension

INTRODUCTION

This self-assessment instrument is supposed to approximate your knowledge, attitude, and practice of Reason, one of four REAL wellness dimensions. Three other self-assessment instruments serve the same function for the dimensions of Exuberance, Athleticism, and Liberty.

REAL WELLNESS

REAL is an acronym for the four dimensions of REAL wellness. R is for Reason, the first of the four dimensions of this concept . the other three are Exuberance, Athleticism, and Liberty. Only the rationale dimension is addressed during this section of the overall REAL Wellness Self-Assessment.

The purpose of the four self-assessments is to enable you to become familiar with and more committed to a real wellness mindset/lifestyle. the overall goal could also be a philosophy and set of mental habits guided by reason, inspired by exuberance, supported with athleticism and enriched by increased personal liberties.

Each statement is prefaced by a background commentary. Upon completion of ratings for the ten statements, an interpretative commentary is provided based upon your cumulative score. a spread of Reason-focused books are included as recommended readings.

SCORING

The Reason self-assessment, contains ten statements. you're asked to choose variety from one to five that reflects the extent to which you agree or afflict the statement. If you strongly believe that your thinking or situation aligns with the statement, place the quantity 5 as your answer choice within the space provided. If you strongly disagree, enter the quantity 1.

These are the two extreme positions.

The middle number 3 represents a neutral position, indicating that you simply simply aren't sure where you fit or take a middle ground position for this statement.

The numbers 2 and 4 should be selected to express a modest alignment favoring one side or the other along the five-part continuum. the quantity 2 would reflect mild disagreement; 4 mild agreement with the statement.

A NOTE FOR BEST RESULTS

This instrument isn't intended as a contest, but rather for purposes of a personal self-assessment. Therefore, please be scrupulously frank along side your self-assessment ratings.

The value of the assessment goes to be within the degree to which your score accurately represents your thinking. The cumulative score of point totals for all ten statements will determine the feedback provided. The feedback category should be valuable for guiding positive adjustments if needed and desired.

Enjoy the tactic .

TEN STATEMENTS

I. Background

Carl Sagan, within the Demon-Haunted World, expressed the view that our cultural motifs, educational system, and communications media have failed the overall public. Science is filtered bent the aim that what trickles through is actually pretense and confusion. We accept things uncritically, we're overly influenced by our hopes, conceits, and unexamined beliefs. We're reluctant to seem at ourselves as we actually are. Tens of millions embrace alternate facts and reject plain evidence because of polarized loyalties. We're overly reliant upon the consolations of faith and negligent about objective scrutiny of traditions.

Statement # 1

I give no credence whatsoever to the following: Horoscopes, Atlantis, the Bermuda Triangle , the Shroud of Turin, the prophecies of Nostradamus, the efficacy of homeopathy, revelations in numerology, documented visits by UFOs, conspiracies regarding the moon landing, telepathy and/or levitation _____

II. Background

In Demon-Haunted World, Carl Sagan suggests our perceptions are fallible, we sometimes see what isn't there, we're prey to optical illusions, we hallucinate which we are error-prone. to boost our immunity to such contagions, he created a baloney detection kit for BS-busting and important thinking.

Statement # 2

I am conscious of these dysfunctional perception tendencies and aware of the need to guard against them. _____

III. Background

Superstition is defined as a widely held but unjustified belief in improbable causation or magical thinking. Examples include justification for miracles, fear of a specific number like 13, reliance upon lucky charms, the healing power of crystals/trinkets/amulets or potions, and thus the effectiveness of chants or mantras to cause something devoutly to be wished.

Statement # 3

I favor reason over superstition, evidence over belief, facts over faith. _____

IV. Background

Over eons of some time , mankind has verified the night sky and wondered, Why are we here, and what's it all about?

Statement # 4

Science guides my thinking on such universal, timeless, and extraordinarily difficult eternal mysteries. _____

V. Background

Being guided by reason could also be a never-ending gift that keeps on giving, a life-long journey of discovery. A skeptic is humble, willing to explore new areas, appreciates what proportion she doesn't know and welcomes, almost celebrates, ideas/revelations/or discoveries that invite changes in beliefs, even those long-held and favored by family, friends, and society.

Statement # 5

If I were to encounter ideas or findings from respected sources that contradict a belief or other aspect of my worldview, i'd welcome such new information and appearance into it with an open mind. _____

VI. Background

While introducing the methodology, the great Greek physician within the Age of Pericles, Hippocrates, urged careful and meticulous observation, leaving nothing to chance, overlooking nothing,

combining contradictory observations and allowing much time to resolve matters.

Statement # 6

I am fully in unison with such advice from the daddy of medicine . _____

VII. Background

Myths and miracle stories often appeal to our emotional needs, to our desires to be protected and loved. many folks profess belief within the existence of a grand plan for our existence, that we as individuals are special which death is not the top. These cultural beliefs include the thought that an unknowable, invisible, omnipotent, and all-wise force of some kind looks out for each and every one of us which we all have a special purpose and, to boot, that there is life after death. All or variety of those claims could even be true, nobody knows anything definitive, reliable or verifiable about an afterlife. There is, however,

Statement # 7

I place no stock in supernatural myths or miracle stories. _____

VIII. Background

Among the foremost common logical fallacies employed to justify propositions are: personal , argument from authority, appeal to ignorance, argument from adverse consequence, special pleading, begging the question, observational selection, statistics of small numbers and misunderstanding the character of statistics.

Statement # 8

I am conversant in and check out to be alert so as to avoid these fallacies of logic and rhetoric. _____

IX. Background

The burden for supporting or providing evidence for the proof of any claim rests with the party who advances it.

Statement # 9

I'm quite comfortable dismissing out-of-hand, without reservation or lingering anxiety, suggestions or expectations that I'm liable for disproving assertions tendered by someone who wants me to believe something. _____

X. Background

Guy Harrison, author of several critical thinking guidebooks, like Good Thinking, identified what he termed, "The Dirty Dozen" common mental mistakes that hijack rational decision-making. Most are self-explanatory. they're the emotion potion, popularity, straw person, loaded question, illusion , false dilemma, explaining by naming, circular reasoning, authority worship, special pleading, burden of proof and personal attacks.

Statement # 10

I'm conversant in all or most of those obstacles to effectiveness in exercising the important wellness dimension skills of Reason. _____

INTERPRETATION OF SCORE

Add the entire count for every of for your responses to the ten statements. The range are going to be from ten to 50.

The following commentary is impressionistic, subjective and approximate; it's not based upon robust randomized clinical trials, nor does the author proclaim nor imply magisterium via ex cathedra sources of inspiration or certainty. Rather, the interpretation will but suggest the extent of your familiarity with the character of Reason. It reflects your tendencies to form choices within a variety from seat-of-the-pants impulsiveness to going along side familiar customs observed over time to a near-devotion to reasoned judgments for deciding things. within the latter case, you'll be feted as an individual highly rational, little influenced by or reliant upon traditions or cultural norms.

And now, the interpretation of your score from a Reason perspective.

10 to 20

It would be an irony of historic proportion to suggest you've got opportunities to form advances within the use of Reason to guide your thinking. Nonetheless, i can not resist -- you'll make better decisions and derive benefits from more systematic, deliberative and cautious decision-making.

Consider doubt and skepticism during a new light -- both improve your chances for creating better deals, avoiding mistakes major and otherwise and selecting more reliable friends and associates.

Cultivating a talent for systematic decision-making and reassessing beliefs you hold thanks to indoctrination or ill-informed companions could prove satisfying and productive. Consider exposing yourself (not literally) to people with different ideas so as to get why some folks, especially those whose life experiences, backgrounds and educations are different from your own, or who simply take positions contrasting your own. you do not want to possess it said of you, as Washington Post reporter Eugene Robinson said of a number one U.S. politician, namely, that "your sort of making decisions is... arbitrary and anecdote-based, that you simply simply simply simply believe cronies who haven't any relevant expertise; that you reject science or fail to know how science even works; that you show a defiant stubbornness in clinging to what you think that you recognize -- even once you don't actually know it; that you are obsessive even within the face of contrary evidence and impervious to fact-based arguments you do not want to listen to ."

(Source: Eugene Robinson, "The One Word That Explains Why Trump shouldn't Be President," Washington Post, April 6, 2020.)

It's likely that you simply simply hold deep-seated convictions that you tend to defend automatically, which you're not inclined to weigh or entertain opinions or data at odds together with your current orientation.

Naturally, it's quite possible that you simply are right about everything, which you'll perceive no good reasons to justify other possibilities. Perhaps your experience with individuals who advocate science-based positions has not been fruitful or satisfying, that a lot of professionals seem antagonistic to or dismissive of convictions you care for . You may, for instance , be absolutely convinced of the

value, reliability and evidence for what others see as myths and superstitions. Examples noted within the initial question, like horoscopes, the Bermuda Triangle , the prophesies of Nostradamus or the efficacy of homeopathy may make perfect sense to you. There might be benefits, however, in examining, during a non-confrontational way, the case for doubt about issues which most scientists consider irrational and of little or no merit.

21 to 30

You seem to be moving along the center of the proverbial road with reference to Reason. you're still a touch on the short end of the rationale spectrum but shortly from aligning with the skill elements of effective decision-making. Perhaps you would possibly consider devoting a while to reading about meaning and purpose, yours also as that of mankind and every one else. There are rich, wonder-provoking books, movies, lectures, museum exhibitions and other resources for exploring these and other topics under the rationale dimension that reflect modern science. Books and courses on critical thinking or effective decision-making also are excellent resources for this purpose.

The quality of reasoning is far suffering from knowledge. The more you recognize about the problems of the days , matters like how viruses are transmitted, the importance of vaccinations, the essential facts about global climate change , erosion, increase , solar power , atomic power , deforestation and sustainability of key resources, AI then much else, the higher your thinking are going to be on broad concerns -- economics, politics, personal relations included. additionally , you'll be less likely to be swayed by crackpots.

31 to 40

Well done -- you're on the proper track, well along to becoming a master of the rationale dimension of REAL wellness. You recognize that Reason skills are often the difference between success and failure in much of what you undertake in life, whether earth-shaking in nature or hardly noticeable at the time. The human brain doesn't instinctively function critically--we are susceptible to biases, prejudices, distortions in perceptions, inclinations toward horribilizing and catastrophic thinking, confirmation bias and lots of other sorts of muddled, dysfunctional information science . you've got managed to develop the talents to regulate and redirect many if not most such mental hazards. the talents you've got , along side the adoption of additional ways of disciplined cogitating, will promote your creativity and prospects for fulfillment within the knowledge economy and your comfort in self-evaluation.

Finally, though there are many additional benefits of effective decision-making, consider the importance of Reason skills for those that take college entrance exams. Knowing what you've got demonstrated you already know while adding increased skills of evaluation and assessment might make the difference between acceptance at a Harvard, MIT or other Stanford-level school, or

settling for Trump University.

41 to 50

Outstanding. Congratulations. Gilbert and Sullivan might exclaim that you simply are the very model of a contemporary major general of critical thinking, Hippocrates would offer you high marks for Reason and Carl Sagan and Guy Harrison and other scholars of Reason would see you as are the type of thinker vitally needed in our demon-haunted world. you're knowing the common logical fallacies and aware of most of the tricks of scammers, grifters, advertisers and other charlatans, secular and theological, who feed on gullible innocents. If someone tries to sell you the Brooklyn Bridge , he better be ready with the deed of title and a letter from the mayor, for starters. The scammer will need powerful evidence if he wants you to believe the Bridge is his to sell. you recognize definitely that sole responsibility for the burden of proof rests with whomever wants to convince you of 1 claim or another.

Your reason skills are such you're positioned to optimize your relationship with yourself et al. . you've got made the transition from fear-based reactive strategies to what Maslow called self-actualization and transcendence. you ought to consider yourself an idea leader, raising the consciousness of others so as that they, too, might experience more creativity and fulfillment like you've got managed. you recognize your strengths. you're clear about the outcomes that matter most. What's more, you recognize strategies that serve your chances, not only to satisfy your needs, but to assist others meet theirs, as well.

rating :